Swiss vs Turkish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Swiss
Turkish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Swiss
Turks
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Turkish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,423,995 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 47.0% | 20.9% |
| Range | 45.9% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 8.3% |
| Median | 8.8% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Turks by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Zimbabwean (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Austrian (10.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Ukrainian (10.1%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |