Swiss vs Austrian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Swiss
Austrian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Swiss
Austrians
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
MALE POVERTY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Austrian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,423,995 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,474,043 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.37%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Austrian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 47.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.9% | 96.0% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 21.7% |
| Median | 8.8% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 17.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 23.2% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Austrians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Zimbabwean (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Ukrainian (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Europe (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Scandinavian (10.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |