South American Indian vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Czechoslovakian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Czechoslovakians
9.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
38.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,455,459 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 9.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 14.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 23.0% |
Range | 30.7% | 21.9% |
Mean | 9.3% | 9.4% |
Median | 7.4% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (9.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (9.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Morocco (9.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Hmong (9.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Colombian (9.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 44.4 /100 | #179 | Average 9.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 43.4 /100 | #180 | Average 9.1% |
Hmong | 40.2 /100 | #181 | Average 9.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 40.2 /100 | #182 | Average 9.1% |
Uruguayans | 39.2 /100 | #183 | Fair 9.1% |
South American Indians | 38.7 /100 | #184 | Fair 9.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 38.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 9.1% |
Colombians | 36.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 9.2% |
Delaware | 35.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 9.2% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 34.0 /100 | #188 | Fair 9.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 32.1 /100 | #189 | Fair 9.2% |
Arabs | 31.5 /100 | #190 | Fair 9.2% |
Ugandans | 28.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |