Israeli vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Israeli
Czechoslovakian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Israelis
Czechoslovakians
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,674,574 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 10.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 23.0% |
| Range | 37.2% | 21.9% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 9.4% |
| Median | 7.5% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Chile (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |