Slavic vs Immigrants from Norway Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Slavic
Immigrants from Norway
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Slavs
Immigrants from Norway
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Immigrants from Norway Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,534,488 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 0.51% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 80.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 80.2% | 98.7% |
Mean | 23.6% | 23.7% |
Median | 18.5% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.6% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 31.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 30.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Immigrants from Norway by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.97%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |