Slavic vs Comanche Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Slavic
Comanche
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Slavs
Comanche
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Comanche Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,392,517 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 28.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Comanche |
Minimum | 0.51% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 80.7% | 50.0% |
Range | 80.2% | 44.4% |
Mean | 23.6% | 26.3% |
Median | 18.5% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.6% | 38.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |