Scandinavian vs Polish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Polish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Scandinavians
Poles
7.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Polish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,471,633 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,842,099 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 2.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scandinavian | Polish |
Minimum | 2.7% | 0.85% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 39.6% |
Range | 47.3% | 38.7% |
Mean | 13.3% | 8.1% |
Median | 7.6% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and Poles by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Austria (7.6%, a difference of 0.24%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Australia (7.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |