Polish vs Danish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Danish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Poles
Danes
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Danish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,842,099 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,902,124 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Danish |
| Minimum | 0.85% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 39.6% | 36.6% |
| Range | 38.7% | 33.8% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 8.5% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Danes by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |