Polish vs Iranian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Iranian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Poles
Iranians
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Iranian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,842,099 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,120,313 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 4.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Iranian |
Minimum | 0.85% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 39.6% | 15.0% |
Range | 38.7% | 13.4% |
Mean | 8.1% | 6.0% |
Median | 6.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Iranians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 1.1%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |