Lithuanian vs Danish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Danish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Danes
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Danish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,202,329 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,902,124 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Danish |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 31.6% | 36.6% |
| Range | 29.6% | 33.8% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 8.5% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Danes by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |