Polish vs Bolivian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Bolivian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Poles
Bolivians
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Bolivian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,970,133 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,589,682 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 3.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Bolivian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 46.0% | 29.9% |
| Range | 44.2% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 8.6% |
| Median | 8.8% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Bolivians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Eastern European (9.6%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |