Pima vs Kiowa Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Kiowa
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Pima
Kiowa
21.9%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Kiowa Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,541,821 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,000 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 29.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Kiowa |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 80.8% | 31.0% |
| Range | 78.3% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 26.5% | 18.7% |
| Median | 24.9% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.9% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.8% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Kiowa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Lumbee (21.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Yemen (21.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 4.8%), Yup'ik (20.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and Navajo (23.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Ute (16.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Paiute (16.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American Indian (16.7%, a difference of 0.82%), Black/African American (17.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.1% |