Pennsylvania German vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Choctaw
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,066,228 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 15.4%.
![Pennsylvania German vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/pennsylvania-germans-vs-choctaw-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Choctaw |
Minimum | 1.8% | 12.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.2% | 87.4% |
Mean | 31.6% | 41.2% |
Median | 24.5% | 38.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.6% | 46.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.1% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |