Immigrants from Eritrea vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eritrea
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eritrea
Choctaw
21.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
7.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eritrea vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,658,207 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 24.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eritrea | Choctaw |
Minimum | 3.5% | 12.6% |
Maximum | 56.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.6% | 87.4% |
Mean | 23.7% | 41.2% |
Median | 21.8% | 38.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 46.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eritrea by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eritrea are Immigrants from Grenada (21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), German (21.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Scottish (21.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Barbadian (21.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Panamanian (21.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |