Paraguayan vs Australian Poverty
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Australian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Paraguayans
Australians
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Australian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,102,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,020,538 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Paraguayan | Australian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 41.9% |
Range | 19.6% | 41.4% |
Mean | 9.4% | 11.4% |
Median | 9.4% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans and Australians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |