Nigerian vs Sudanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Nigerian
Sudanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Nigerians
Sudanese
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Sudanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,122,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,085,531 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nigerian | Sudanese |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 36.9% |
Range | 19.2% | 35.0% |
Mean | 10.0% | 11.5% |
Median | 9.6% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 13.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Nigerians and Sudanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |