Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Chickasaw
12.8%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
6.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,508,254 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 51.7% | 32.8% |
| Range | 49.8% | 30.3% |
| Mean | 16.1% | 15.0% |
| Median | 12.8% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Immigrants from South America (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (12.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Africa (12.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Moroccan (12.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Hawaiian (12.9%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Fijian (13.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.5% |
| Colombians | 10.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 8.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Moroccans | 7.6 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 7.6 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Native Hawaiians | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 6.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Hawaiians | 5.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |