Lumbee vs Yuman Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Yuman
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Yuman
33.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Yuman Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,816,335 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 33.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,574,686 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 29.4%, a difference of 12.1%.
![Lumbee vs Yuman Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/lumbee-vs-yuman-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Yuman |
Minimum | 6.8% | 12.7% |
Maximum | 80.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 73.8% | 87.3% |
Mean | 39.4% | 43.1% |
Median | 39.3% | 39.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.1% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.3% | 52.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.2% | 30.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 24.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Yuman by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Crow (32.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 3.3%), Tohono O'odham (34.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Colville (29.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |