Dutch West Indian vs Yuman Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Yuman
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Yuman
27.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Yuman Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,533,400 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733 and weighted average of 27.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,574,686 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 29.4%, a difference of 7.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Yuman |
Minimum | 18.0% | 12.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 82.0% | 87.3% |
Mean | 42.0% | 43.1% |
Median | 34.7% | 39.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.0% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.9% | 52.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.9% | 30.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.0% | 24.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.6% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians and Yuman by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Apache (27.7%, a difference of 0.91%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.96%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Colville (29.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |