Lumbee vs Yakama Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Yakama
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Yakama
21.9%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Yakama Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,257,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,879 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 31.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Yakama |
| Minimum | 7.2% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 51.2% | 38.1% |
| Range | 44.0% | 34.6% |
| Mean | 26.0% | 18.0% |
| Median | 25.2% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.0% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.2% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.2% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Yakama by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pima (21.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Yemen (21.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 5.1%), Yup'ik (20.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and Crow (20.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (16.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Paiute (16.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Kiowa (16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Ute (16.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and Black/African American (17.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 21.9% |