Italian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Poverty
COMPARE
Italian
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Italians
Immigrants from Hong Kong
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 573,632,055 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,845,930 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 3.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Italian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 18.6% |
| Range | 98.7% | 17.3% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 9.4% |
| Median | 8.5% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |