Italian vs Russian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Italian
Russian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Italians
Russians
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Russian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 573,632,055 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,408,549 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 2.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Italian | Russian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.7% | 96.4% |
Mean | 11.8% | 17.7% |
Median | 8.5% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 16.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 18.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Russians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Greece (11.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Poland (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |