Iraqi vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iraqi
Bhutanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iraqis
Bhutanese
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iraqi vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,824,152 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 17.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iraqi | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.98% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 41.4% |
| Range | 44.5% | 40.1% |
| Mean | 21.3% | 15.9% |
| Median | 20.2% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Iraqis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |