British West Indian vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
British West Indian
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
British West Indians
Turks
21.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,588,382 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 55.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Turkish |
Minimum | 2.5% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 43.1% | 71.9% |
Range | 40.6% | 71.4% |
Mean | 20.4% | 13.5% |
Median | 19.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Seminole (21.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |