Immigrants from South America vs Slavic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Slavic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Slavs
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
30.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,828,470 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 9.5%.
![Immigrants from South America vs Slavic Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/immigrants-from-south-america-vs-slavs-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Slavic |
Minimum | 4.6% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 23.5% | 46.6% |
Range | 18.9% | 46.4% |
Mean | 13.3% | 12.0% |
Median | 13.3% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Iraqi (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (13.7%, a difference of 0.14%), South American Indian (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (13.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Hawaiians | 39.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 13.6% |
Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |