Immigrants from Hungary vs Slavic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Slavic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Slavs
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,645,999 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 29.4% | 46.6% |
Range | 27.9% | 46.4% |
Mean | 10.6% | 12.0% |
Median | 9.8% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Slavs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |