Immigrants from Pakistan vs Pima Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Pakistan
Pima
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Pakistan
Pima
18.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Pima Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,684,274 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 18.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,414,275 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 64.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Pakistan | Pima |
Minimum | 5.1% | 16.1% |
Maximum | 55.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 50.9% | 83.9% |
Mean | 18.3% | 42.9% |
Median | 17.3% | 41.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 24.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 55.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 30.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 22.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 21.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Moldova (18.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Poland (18.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 3.0%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |