Black/African American vs Pima Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Black/African American
Pima
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Pima
26.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Pima Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,844,425 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 26.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,414,275 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 15.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Black/African American | Pima |
Minimum | 17.1% | 16.1% |
Maximum | 49.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 32.1% | 83.9% |
Mean | 28.1% | 42.9% |
Median | 27.8% | 41.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.8% | 24.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 55.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 30.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 22.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans and Pima by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.95%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 3.0%), Colville (29.1%, a difference of 4.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 4.8%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and Ute (28.4%, a difference of 6.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |