Immigrants from Oceania vs Asian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Asian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Asians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Asian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,886,989 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 11.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Asian |
| Minimum | 10.7% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 44.6% | 21.9% |
| Range | 33.9% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 10.3% |
| Median | 15.5% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Asians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |