Immigrants from Italy vs Asian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Asian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Asians
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Asian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,078,093 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,886,989 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Asian |
Minimum | 4.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 21.9% |
Range | 18.5% | 20.0% |
Mean | 9.3% | 10.3% |
Median | 8.4% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Asians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |