Immigrants from Oceania vs Afghan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Afghan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Afghans
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Afghan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,814,784 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Afghan |
| Minimum | 10.7% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 44.6% | 31.3% |
| Range | 33.9% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 13.2% |
| Median | 15.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |