Immigrants from Micronesia vs Moroccan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Moroccan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Moroccans
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Moroccan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,598,516 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,724,575 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Moroccan |
Minimum | 5.5% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 51.5% |
Range | 23.0% | 47.1% |
Mean | 15.2% | 16.6% |
Median | 14.1% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Moroccans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are American (14.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |