Immigrants from Micronesia vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Alaskan Athabascans
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,598,516 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 5.5% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 69.0% |
Range | 23.0% | 68.2% |
Mean | 15.2% | 21.7% |
Median | 14.1% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 28.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are American (14.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |