Immigrants from Jamaica vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Zimbabweans
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
30.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,568,365 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 9.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 4.4% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 59.3% | 59.7% |
Range | 54.9% | 58.6% |
Mean | 20.4% | 18.9% |
Median | 20.8% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.1% | 23.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Germany (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |