Afghan vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Afghan
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Afghans
Zimbabweans
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,055,541 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 0.020%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 5.1% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 39.5% | 59.7% |
Range | 34.4% | 58.6% |
Mean | 20.2% | 18.9% |
Median | 18.9% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 23.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |