Estonian vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Estonian
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Estonians
Zimbabweans
19.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,383,678 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 0.92%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Estonian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 59.7% |
| Range | 94.7% | 58.6% |
| Mean | 27.5% | 18.9% |
| Median | 19.7% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.6% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Estonians and Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Immigrants from Brazil (19.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Croatian (19.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from France (19.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Sierra Leonean (19.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Romanian (19.6%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |