Immigrants from Guyana vs Immigrants from Norway Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guyana
Immigrants from Norway
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guyana
Immigrants from Norway
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guyana vs Immigrants from Norway Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,103,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,651,083 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 0.80%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guyana | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 0.34% | 9.8% |
Maximum | 52.6% | 65.2% |
Range | 52.3% | 55.4% |
Mean | 19.9% | 25.7% |
Median | 19.5% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Norway by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |