Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Mexico Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Mexico
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Mexico
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Mexico Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,104,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,228,632 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.24%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Mexico |
Minimum | 4.6% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 65.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.2% | 93.3% |
Mean | 22.1% | 27.4% |
Median | 20.2% | 21.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 28.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 19.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Mexico by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.34%), African (16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |