Immigrants from El Salvador vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Alaskan Athabascan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Alaskan Athabascans
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,646,043 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,812,962 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.42%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 30.5% | 72.7% |
| Range | 28.3% | 71.3% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 20.4% |
| Median | 12.2% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 30.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador and Alaskan Athabascans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |