Immigrants from Bahamas vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Mexican American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Mexican American Indians
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,609,154 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 3.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 3.1% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 35.9% |
Range | 33.9% | 33.3% |
Mean | 14.0% | 15.1% |
Median | 13.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Mexican American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Chickasaw (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Spanish American (13.4%, a difference of 0.75%), Cree (13.3%, a difference of 0.78%), Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |