Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Iroquois
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Iroquois
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,609,154 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,214,183 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Iroquois |
Minimum | 3.1% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 33.9% | 96.4% |
Mean | 14.0% | 19.1% |
Median | 13.0% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 19.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Iroquois by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Chickasaw (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Spanish American (13.4%, a difference of 0.75%), Cree (13.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |