Immigrants from Austria vs Central American Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,272,500 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,103,061 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.93%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Austria	Central American
Minimum	1.0%	8.5%
Maximum	79.1%	39.8%
Range	78.0%	31.3%
Mean	22.8%	20.0%
Median	18.7%	19.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.3%	17.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	25.7%	21.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.4%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.8%	5.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.6%	5.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Austria and Central Americans by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Austria are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Latin America (19.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Oceania (19.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Syrian (19.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Eastern European (19.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Malaysian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (19.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Belize (19.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Pakistani (19.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%
Yugoslavians	79.0 /100 \| #152	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Japan	78.1 /100 \| #153	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 19.8%
Hungarians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belgium	76.4 /100 \| #156	Good 19.8%
Danes	75.5 /100 \| #157	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 19.8%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	74.4 /100 \| #159	Good 19.8%
Pakistanis	74.1 /100 \| #160	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	74.1 /100 \| #161	Good 19.8%
French Canadians	73.0 /100 \| #162	Good 19.9%
Malaysians	72.7 /100 \| #163	Good 19.9%
Central Americans	70.0 /100 \| #164	Good 19.9%
Eastern Europeans	69.3 /100 \| #165	Good 19.9%