Immigrants from Argentina vs Bulgarian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Bulgarian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Bulgarians
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Bulgarian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,466,881 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,529,625 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 6.3% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 55.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 49.4% | 95.0% |
Mean | 19.7% | 22.4% |
Median | 18.2% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 22.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Bulgarians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |