Immigrants from Argentina vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Tsimshian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Tsimshian
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,466,881 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,615,751 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 0.34%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 6.3% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 55.7% | 41.7% |
Range | 49.4% | 37.1% |
Mean | 19.7% | 23.7% |
Median | 18.2% | 23.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Tsimshian by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |