French American Indian vs Potawatomi Family Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Potawatomi
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Potawatomi
10.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Potawatomi Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,838,011 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,705,487 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.040%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 3.0% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 36.5% | 50.0% |
Range | 33.5% | 46.6% |
Mean | 13.9% | 15.1% |
Median | 11.7% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians and Potawatomi by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |