French American Indian vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Immigrants from Liberia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Immigrants from Liberia
10.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,838,011 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,184,573 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 5.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Immigrants from Liberia |
Minimum | 3.0% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 36.5% | 40.1% |
Range | 33.5% | 37.0% |
Mean | 13.9% | 11.9% |
Median | 11.7% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians and Immigrants from Liberia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.68%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.91%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |