Filipino vs Bulgarian Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Bulgarian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Bulgarians
10.1%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Bulgarian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,160,394 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,564,290 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 19.2% | 53.2% |
Range | 17.6% | 52.7% |
Mean | 8.1% | 8.2% |
Median | 8.4% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 9.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Bulgarians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.86%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 0.99%), Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |