Filipino vs Lithuanian Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Lithuanian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Lithuanians
10.1%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Lithuanian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,160,394 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,719,572 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 3.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.071% |
Maximum | 19.2% | 29.6% |
Range | 17.6% | 29.5% |
Mean | 8.1% | 10.3% |
Median | 8.4% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Lithuanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |