Ecuadorian vs Salvadoran Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Salvadoran
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Salvadorans
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Salvadoran Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,585,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,655,447 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.30%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Salvadoran |
Minimum | 0.14% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 50.9% |
Range | 28.5% | 49.7% |
Mean | 14.8% | 15.9% |
Median | 14.1% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Salvadorans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |