Dutch West Indian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Pima
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,504,644 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 30.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Pima |
Minimum | 9.2% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.4% | 89.0% |
Mean | 27.2% | 41.2% |
Median | 25.0% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.2% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Houma (21.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |